Dune: Part One Review

 In the past, there were two popular sci-fi novels that went against the mainstream culture. One was "Stranger in a Strange Land" by Robert Heinlein, known for introducing the term "grok." The other was Frank Herbert's 1965 novel "Dune," a futuristic story with political undertones against big corporations, supporting eco-radicalism, and showing appreciation for Islamic culture. The enduring interest of big producers and corporations in turning "Dune" into a film adaptation has been a long-standing mystery.

Back when I was a pretentious teenager in the 1970s, I wasn't much into sci-fi, so I missed out on "Dune: Part One" Even when the 1984 film directed by David Lynch came out, I didn't bother watching it. In my early twenties, my film interests revolved around David Lynch's work, and "Dune" wasn't on my radar. Recently, I decided to read Herbert's book out of curiosity about the paths not taken in my youth. Despite its clunky prose and awkward dialogue, I found myself enjoying the social commentary woven into the narrative, coupled with action and suspense reminiscent of old serials.

Dune Part One

Now, Denis Villeneuve has directed a new film adaptation of "Dune," and it visually captures the book's scenes beautifully. "Dune" is set in the distant future, where humanity has advanced scientifically and evolved spiritually. The Atreides imperial family is assigned to rule the desert planet Arrakis, a place crucial for a substance known as "the spice" (akin to crude oil for environmental enthusiasts). The planet presents various dangers for off-worlders, creating a compelling backdrop for the story.


I haven't been a big fan of Denis Villeneuve's previous films, but I have to admit he did a pretty good job with the movie adaptation of "Dune." Well, at least with about two-thirds of it (he calls it "Dune Part 1"). The film, lasting two and a half hours, provides an epic experience, and the title makes it clear that there's more to come.


Villeneuve stayed true to Frank Herbert's vision from the book, not forcing his own ideas onto the story. Despite Villeneuve's reputation as a serious filmmaker, the movie maintains a balance between grandeur and seriousness, spiced up with thrilling scenes like the Gom Jabbar test and sandworm encounters.


The cast, led by Timothée Chalamet as Paul Atreides, does a great job embodying Herbert's characters. The film pays tribute to classic cinematic experiences, drawing inspiration from movies like "Lawrence of Arabia" and "Apocalypse Now." Hans Zimmer's score adds a modern touch with nods to iconic soundtracks.


Villeneuve, who initially criticized the decision to stream "Dune" simultaneously with its theatrical release, made the movie to celebrate the big-screen experience. After watching it, I got what he meant. The film is filled with cinematic references and influences, making it a visual treat. While I'll always have a soft spot for Lynch's version, Villeneuve's "Dune" truly captures the essence of the novel.


Next Post Previous Post