LEAD AND COPPER (2023) FILM REVIEW

"Lead and Copper" stands out from typical social justice films. Hart emphasizes its distinctiveness, underscoring the difficulties encountered during its production and the resistance it faced. The documentary addresses a longstanding issue in Flint, Michigan, where citizens have been subjected to a distressing situation concerning a basic necessity: their daily water consumption. Industries have contaminated the water with lead, particularly affecting vulnerable populations, especially children who have been poisoned.

The best film delves into the grim reality, offering a revealing look at how various individuals, from scientists to government officials, have responded to the crisis. Unfortunately, not all contributions have been helpful.

Hart's filmmaking approach is noteworthy. Adopting a guerrilla style, he navigates the complexities of the issue without necessarily providing a clear solution. His goal is to alert the audience and authorities that action is needed because this crisis could happen to anyone. Empathy is a central theme, achieved through a narrative structure that relies on the voices of those directly affected – the citizens of Flint who bravely speak out against a government that should protect them. "Lead and Copper" serves as their channel, loud enough for audiences to hear their pleas.

• Read more: The Crime is Mine (2023) Movie Review

• Read more: wonka 2023 movie review

Unlike some documentaries that take a clear stance, Hart refrains from explicit commentary, allowing viewers to form their own opinions. While responsibility is a significant aspect in the ecological disaster portrayed, "Lead and Copper" isn't designed to merely point fingers. Instead, it focuses on those who need scrutiny, letting viewers draw their own conclusions.